Published by Haight Ashbury Publications
|
SAMHSA’s Strengthening Communities for Youth Initiative |
|
Table of Contents
(scroll
down to view abstracts)
Volume 40, Number 1
March 2008
View sample article |
|
Editors’ Introduction: SAMHSA’s Strengthening Communities
for Youth Initiative
—
Douglas C. Smith, Ph.D. & Randolph D. Muck, M.Ed.
. |
The Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) Initiative: A
Cluster Analysis of the Services Received, Their Correlates
and How They are Associated with Outcomes
—
Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D.; Melissa L. Ives, M.S.W.; Michelle
K. White, Ph.D. & Randolph D. Muck, M.Ed. |
One-Year Treatment Patterns and Change Trajectories for
Adolescents Participating in Outpatient Treatment for the
First Time
—
Susan H. Godley, Rh.D; Lora L. Passetti, M.S.; Rodney R.
Funk, B.S.; Bryan R. Garner, Ph.D. & Mark D. Godley,
Ph.D. |
Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Clinicians’ Self-Help
Meeting Referral Practices and Adolescent Attendance Rates
—
Lora L. Passetti, M.S. & Susan H. Godley, Rh.D. |
Bringing Adolescents into Substance Abuse Treatment through
Community Outreach and Engagement: The Hartford Youth
Project
—
Reginald Simmons, Ph.D.; Jane Ungemack, Dr.P.H.; Jennifer
Sussman, M.F.A.; Robyn Anderson, M.A.;
Sandra Adorno; Jose Aguayo, A.A.; Khary Black, B.A; Steven
Hodge, B.A; Rachel Tirnady, B.A.
View
this article |
Predictors of Early Therapeutic Alliance Among Adolescents
in Substance Abuse Treatment
—
Bryan R. Garner, Ph.D.; Susan H. Godley, Rh.D. & Rodney R.
Funk, B.S. |
Victimization Among African-American Adolescents in
Substance Abuse Treatment
—
Brian E. Perron, Ph.D.; Heather J. Gotham, Ph.D. & Dong Cho,
Ph.D.
|
Clinical Outcomes of Traumatized Youth in Adolescent
Substance Abuse Treatment: A Longitudinal Multisite Study
—
Julie K. Williams, Ph.D., L.M.S.W.; Douglas C. Smith, Ph.D.,
L.M.S.W.; Hyonggin An, Ph.D. & James A. Hall, Ph.D., L.I.S.W. |
Understanding Clinical Complexity in Delinquent Youth:
Comorbidities, Service Utilization, Cost, and Outcomes
—
David L. Hussey, Ph.D.; Allyson M. Drinkard, M.A.; Lynn
Falletta, M.P.A., M.A. & Daniel J. Flannery, Ph.D. |
An Implementation Story: Moving the GAIN from Pilot Project
to Statewide Use
—
Heather J. Gotham, Ph.D.; Michelle K. White, Ph.D.; Hannah
S. Bergethon, B.A.; Tim Feeney, B.A.; Dong W. Cho, Ph.D. &
Barbara Keehn, R.N., B.S.N. |
Substance Abuse Treatment with Rural Adolescents: Issues and
Outcomes
—
James A. Hall, Ph.D., L.I.S.W.; Douglas C. Smith,
Ph.D., L.M.S.W.; Scott D. Easton, L.M.S.W.; Hyonggin
An, Ph.D; Julie K. Williams, Ph.D., L.M.S.W.; Susan H.
Godley, Rh.D. & Mijin Jang |
COVER ART
—
Epiphyllum Abstract
by Deb Casso
(www.debcasso.com) |
|
Abstracts |
The Strengthening Communities
for Youth (SCY) Initiative: A Cluster Analysis of the
Services Received, Their Correlates and How They are
Associated with Outcomes — Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D.;
Melissa L. Ives, M.S.W.; Michelle K. White, Ph.D. &
Randolph D. Muck, M.Ed.
Abstract —This article describes the Strengthening
Communities for Youth (SCY) initiative using data from 1,297
adolescents in eight U.S. cities (Oakland, CA; Tucson, AZ;
Iowa City, IA; Bloomington, IL; St. Louis, MO; Cleveland,
OH; Louisville, KY, New York, NY) to better understand the
pattern of services they received, how these services varied
by need, and how services were associated with initial
treatment outcomes. Data include adolescent reports
collected with the Global Assessment of Individual Needs
(GAIN) at treatment intake and 90 days post-intake,
information on early therapeutic alliance using a modified
Working Alliance Inventory (WAI), and staff reports from
service logs. Cluster analysis identified four patterns of
treatment received: (1) substance abuse and mental health
treatment, (2) primarily residential treatment, (3)
interrupted treatment, and (4) primarily outpatient
treatment. Outcomes examined included changes in substance
use, substance abuse/dependence problems, recovery
environment risk, as well as risk from social peers, illegal
activity and emotional problems. Overall and for most
groups, treatment was associated with reduced or unchanged
problems in each of these areas. The exception was for
cluster 1, for whom emotional problems actually increased.
Implications for placement, treatment planning and future
research are discussed.
Keywords—adolescent, substance abuse treatment
patterns, cluster analysis, need for treatment, outcomes,
Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) |
|
One-Year Treatment Patterns
and Change Trajectories for Adolescents Participating in
Outpatient Treatment for the First Time — Susan H.
Godley, Rh.D; Lora L. Passetti, M.S.; Rodney R. Funk, B.S.;
Bryan R. Garner, Ph.D. & Mark D. Godley, Ph.D.
Abstract—The American Society on Addiction Medicine’s
Patient Placement criteria are commonly used in adolescent
treatment. However, the use of these criteria and how they
affect the course of treatment and interact with adolescent
change has not been examined. Twelve-month treatment
patterns were examined for 176 adolescents who entered their
first ever episode in a treatment system using these
criteria. Forty-one percent of the adolescents received
additional treatment after their initial outpatient episode
with over 30 unique treatment sequences (i.e., various
combinations of outpatient, intensive outpatient, and
residential treatment). Significant differences in treatment
patterns were found between the change trajectory groups.
For example, adolescents who participated in only one
outpatient treatment episode were more likely to be in the
low alcohol and drug use (AOD) group and less likely to have
high rates of time in a controlled environment or to report
moderate AOD use. Over one-third of the adolescents
participated in additional treatment and almost one-quarter
of those who only participated in outpatient treatment had
problematic use. These findings suggest the need for
clinical monitoring protocols that can be used to identify
adolescents needing additional treatment or recovery
services.
Keywords—adolescents, ASAM, clinical monitoring,
course of recovery, substance use treatment, treatment
patterns |
|
Adolescent Substance Abuse
Treatment Clinicians’ Self-Help Meeting Referral Practices
and Adolescent Attendance Rates — Lora L. Passetti,
M.S. & Susan H. Godley, Rh.D.
Abstract—Clinicians in adolescent substance abuse
treatment programs often recommend attendance at 12-Step
meetings; however, there has been no systematic study of
their referral practices or possible influence on attendance
rates. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to
examine: (a) the self-help referral practices of clinicians
employed in adolescent substance abuse treatment programs;
and (b) the potential relationship between practices and
self-help attendance. Data were analyzed from open-ended
interviews with 28 clinicians at eight CSAT-funded SCY sites
and from follow-up interviews with over 1,600 adolescents.
Results indicated that clinicians referred adolescents
almost exclusively to 12-Step groups. Various factors were
considered when recommending attendance, including substance
use severity and ability to grasp 12-Step concepts. Meeting
age composition and availability were common influences when
suggesting specific meetings. Clinicians who described their
treatment programs as “12-Step based” and actively linked
adolescents to groups tended to be employed at sites that
had the highest overall rates of self-help attendance.
Findings suggest that if clinicians want to facilitate
self-help attendance, they might assess the “fit” between
individual adolescents and particular meetings.
Additionally, programs may want to develop and train staff
in standardized referral procedures. Further research is
needed to empirically test referral strategies with
adolescents.
Keywords—adolescent, referral, self-help, substance
use treatment |
|
Bringing Adolescents into
Substance Abuse Treatment through Community Outreach and
Engagement: The Hartford Youth Project — Reginald
Simmons, Ph.D.; Jane Ungemack, Dr.P.H.; Jennifer Sussman,
M.F.A.; Robyn Anderson, M.A.; Sandra Adorno; Jose Aguayo,
A.A.; Khary Black, B.A; Steven Hodge, B.A; Rachel Tirnady,
B.A.
Abstract—While outreach and case management services
have been shown to improve retention of at-risk youth in
behavioral health treatment, these important support
services are challenging to implement. The Hartford Youth
Project (HYP), established by the Connecticut Department of
Children and Families as a pilot for the state adolescent
substance abuse treatment system, made outreach and
engagement integral to its system of care. HYP brought
together a network of stakeholders: referral sources
(juvenile justice, schools, community agencies, child
welfare, and families); community-based outreach agencies;
treatment providers; and an administrative service
organization responsible for project coordination.
Culturally competent Engagement Specialists located in
community agencies were responsible for: cultivation of
referral sources; community outreach; screening and
assessment; engagement of youth and families in treatment;
case management; service planning; recovery support; and
advocacy. This article describes HYP’s approach to
identifying and engaging youth in treatment, as well as its
challenges. Use of family-based treatment models,
expectations of referral sources, limited service capacity,
youth and family problems, and staff turnover were all
factors that affected the outreach and engagement process.
Process, baseline assessment and case study data are used to
describe the needs and issues specific to Hartford’s
substance-abusing Latino and African-American youth.
Keywords—adolescent, outreach, substance abuse
treatment |
|
Predictors of Early
Therapeutic Alliance Among Adolescents in Substance Abuse
Treatment — Bryan R. Garner, Ph.D.; Susan H. Godley,
Rh.D. & Rodney R. Funk, B.S.
Abstract—Given the importance of the therapeutic
alliance in achieving positive treatment outcomes, research
is needed to illuminate the factors that contribute to the
development of this important relationship. The aim of the
current study was to expand upon the existing literature by
examining predictors of the early therapeutic alliance among
adolescents treated in two outpatient programs. Use of
multilevel modeling techniques revealed that the majority of
the variance in adolescents’ ratings of the therapeutic
alliance was due to adolescent factors (91%), while the
variance in therapist ratings of alliance were nearly
equally divided between adolescent and therapist factors
(52% vs. 48%). Participant age was found to be the only
significant predictor of therapist-rated alliance, with
therapists reporting higher alliances with older
adolescents. Adolescents reporting higher levels of social
support, greater problem recognition, and more reasons for
quitting also reported higher therapeutic alliance ratings.
Future research is needed to examine if early identification
of adolescents with low social support and problem
recognition combined with brief treatment readiness
interventions can be a promising approach to help improve
therapeutic engagement and post-treatment substance use
outcomes.
Keywords—adolescent, substance abuse, therapeutic
relationship, working alliance |
|
Victimization Among
African-American Adolescents in Substance Abuse Treatment
— Brian E. Perron, Ph.D.; Heather J. Gotham, Ph.D. &
Dong Cho, Ph.D.
Abstract—Given the importance of the therapeutic
alliance in achieving positive treatment outcomes, research
is needed to illuminate the factors that contribute to the
development of this important relationship. The aim of the
current study was to expand upon the existing literature by
examining predictors of the early therapeutic alliance among
adolescents treated in two outpatient programs. Use of
multilevel modeling techniques revealed that the majority of
the variance in adolescents’ ratings of the therapeutic
alliance was due to adolescent factors (91%), while the
variance in therapist ratings of alliance were nearly
equally divided between adolescent and therapist factors
(52% vs. 48%). Participant age was found to be the only
significant predictor of therapist-rated alliance, with
therapists reporting higher alliances with older
adolescents. Adolescents reporting higher levels of social
support, greater problem recognition, and more reasons for
quitting also reported higher therapeutic alliance ratings.
Future research is needed to examine if early identification
of adolescents with low social support and problem
recognition combined with brief treatment readiness
interventions can be a promising approach to help improve
therapeutic engagement and post-treatment substance use
outcomes.
Keywords—adolescent, substance abuse, therapeutic
relationship, working alliance |
|
Clinical Outcomes of
Traumatized Youth in Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment:
A Longitudinal Multisite Study — Julie K. Williams,
Ph.D., L.M.S.W.; Douglas C. Smith, Ph.D., L.M.S.W.; Hyonggin
An, Ph.D. & James A. Hall, Ph.D., L.I.S.W.
Abstract—The purpose of this study was to evaluate
the effectiveness of outpatient substance abuse treatment
for youth with high traumatic stress compared to youth
without high traumatic stress in substance abuse treatment
centers across the United States. The data for this study
were gathered using a longitudinal survey design with
purposive sampling from nine drug treatment delivery systems
across the United States participating in the cooperative
grant Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) awarded by
SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) between
September 2002 and June 2006. Follow-up assessments were
conducted with the youth at three, six, and 12 months
following intake. Traumatized youth responded to outpatient
treatment in a similar pattern when compared to
nontraumatized youth, although the traumatized youth had
consistently higher scores on substance use frequency and
substance problems scales than nontraumatized youth
throughout the study. Current empirically validated
treatments for adolescent substance abuse do not prepare the
practitioner for trauma-informed practice or specifically
address trauma-informed recovery. Based on our results, we
advocate for the development and integration of
trauma-informed practice within substance abuse treatment
for adolescents to help them recover from trauma and
substance abuse issues.
Keywords—adolescent, drug abuse, substance abuse
treatment, trauma |
|
Understanding Clinical
Complexity in Delinquent Youth: Comorbidities, Service
Utilization, Cost, and Outcomes — David L. Hussey,
Ph.D.; Allyson M. Drinkard, M.A.; Lynn Falletta, M.P.A.,
M.A. & Daniel J. Flannery, Ph.D.
Abstract—This study describes the extent and severity
of multiple comorbidities in a juvenile detention center
population, and explores how these numerous problems impact
the utilization of treatment services, costs, and outcomes
including those for substance abuse, mental illness, and
criminal activity. Cluster analyses of the outcome scales at
intake yielded two groups: youth high (42%) and youth lower
(58%) on all factors. Girls experienced the most significant
impairments across emotional problems, behavior complexity,
internal mental distress, and victimization domains,
utilized significantly more units of residential treatment,
individual counseling and case management, and had the
highest treatment costs. The total cost of services
($1,171,290, N = 114) was significantly related to substance
problems in the past year (r = .219, p < .05), emotional
problems (r = .237, p < .05), behavior complexity (r = .318,
p < .05), internal mental distress (r = .263, p < .05),
environmental risk (r = .205, p < .05), and conflict tactics
(r = .240, p < .05). Despite initial differences in measures
of baseline severity, high and low cluster youth, and boys
and girls in general, achieved similar results on the key
outcome variables 12 months later. Study implications
include a need for co-occurring, integrated treatment
efforts that address family, emotional, and mental health
problems of delinquent youth (especially females) in order
to improve their ability to successfully attend to substance
abuse problems and interpersonal conflicts.
Keywords—adolescent, comorbidity, delinquent,
substance abuse treatment |
|
An Implementation Story:
Moving the GAIN from Pilot Project to Statewide Use —
Heather J. Gotham, Ph.D.; Michelle K. White, Ph.D.; Hannah
S. Bergethon, B.A.; Tim Feeney, B.A.; Dong W. Cho, Ph.D. &
Barbara Keehn, R.N., B.S.N.
Abstract—Similar to implementing an evidence-based
practice (EPB), implementing an evidence-based assessment (EBA)
is a long, complex process that can take several years to
complete. Between 2002 and 2007, the state of Missouri first
piloted the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Initial
(GAIN-I; Dennis et al. 2006) assessment at one
state-contracted adolescent substance abuse treatment
program and then implemented the GAIN statewide. This case
study documents the implementation process through Fixsen
and colleagues’ (2005) six stages of implementation, from
exploration and adoption through sustainability, and
outlines challenges and solutions encountered at the
external, organizational, and individual staff level.
Strengths of this project included recognition that
implementation is an ongoing multistep process, strong
support by state-level staff, contracting with an external
purveyor for ongoing technical assistance at the agency
level as well as training of front-line clinicians, and an
implementation team comprised of stakeholders at multiple
levels.
Keywords—adolescent substance abuse treatment
research, evidence-based assessment, implementation |
|
Substance Abuse Treatment
with Rural Adolescents: Issues and Outcomes — James
A. Hall, Ph.D., L.I.S.W.; Douglas C. Smith, Ph.D., L.M.S.W.;
Scott D. Easton, L.M.S.W.; Hyonggin An, Ph.D; Julie K.
Williams, Ph.D., L.M.S.W.; Susan H. Godley, Rh.D. & Mijin
Jang
Abstract—This study compared the characteristics and
treatment outcomes of rural adolescents with urban
adolescents in substance abuse treatment programs in CSAT’s
Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) initiative. Using
data from ten SCY programs nationally, the authors
classified adolescents as rural or urban using Rural-Urban
Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. We then evaluated changes in
substance use frequency and substance-related problems at
three, six, and 12 months after baseline assessments for the
two sites that treated rural (n = 59) and urban (n = 345)
youth in outpatient settings. Data were analyzed using a
two-part mixed effects model for zero-saturated dependent
variables. At treatment intake, rural youth exhibited
greater problem severity on a number of substance abuse and
mental health indices. From intake to the 12-month follow-up
point, the percentages of both urban and rural youth who
reported abstinence increased significantly. Both rural and
urban youth also reported fewer problems due to substance
use over time, but differences between groups were not
consistent. Overall, treatment appears equally effective for
both rural and urban adolescents. As few rural youth
obtained treatment, we encourage funding agencies and
treatment providers to consider innovative ways for
providing services in rural areas and addressing gaps in
primary prevention, early identification, and continuing
care.
Keywords—adolescent, drug abuse, rural studies,
substance abuse treatment |
|
|
|
Vol. 40 (1)
March 2008
SAMHSA's Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY)
Initiative
Table of Contents
(downloadable file)
View sample article |